Independent Secondary Market Diligence

Know what you're actually buying.

Before you commit capital to a private secondary position, we analyze the entire structure — assessing ownership chain integrity, quantifying fee exposure across all disclosed layers, and identifying the gaps that create real risk.

Four questions most buyers can't answer

The listing says "SpaceX" or "Anthropic." The underlying structure is a chain of legal entities — each with its own fee provisions, transfer restrictions, and counterparty risk. The platforms facilitating these transactions have no obligation to explain the structure, and most don't.

01

What is the true all-in cost of the position?

Each SPV layer carries its own fee provisions — management fees, carried interest, and often undisclosed markups on the underlying share price. A single layer typically runs 2% management plus 10% carry. Stack two or three layers and the compounding drag becomes material, often consuming a substantial portion of gross returns.

02

Is the transfer structure authorized?

Several of the most actively traded private companies have moved to block or void unauthorized SPV transfers. If the vehicle holding your position was never recognized by the issuing company, the position may be unenforceable at exactly the moment it matters — a liquidity event.

03

What is the actual price of the underlying equity?

Some structures include a built-in spread where the sponsor acquires shares at one price and offers them to investors at a markup — layered on top of stated fees. One offering we reviewed carried a 10% upfront fee, 20% carry, and an additional undisclosed price spread above the acquisition cost.

04

Who is the actual counterparty?

For forward purchase contracts, the seller retains legal title until the transfer clears. If the counterparty has pledged the same shares to multiple buyers, or if the issuing company blocks the transfer, the contract may be unenforceable. Even NYSE-listed funds have disclosed in SEC filings that they lack information on the identities of their forward contract counterparties.

This isn't theoretical

Company founders and insiders are publicly warning about structural risk in the secondary market. Enforcement actions have begun. Major liquidity events are approaching.

“The SpaceX IPO will be very interesting. This is going to be a situation where the tide goes out, and there's going to be a lot of people without trunks on.”

— Matt Grimm, Co-Founder of Anduril, on TBPN

Enforcement has arrived

A broker was recently indicted for selling SPV interests in a prominent defense technology company with no actual access to the underlying shares — collecting investor capital with no deliverable equity. He was arrested attempting to leave the country.

Opacity extends to institutional vehicles

A NYSE-listed closed-end fund discloses in its SEC filings that one of its positions passes through five underlying SPV layers. For its forward contracts, it states it does not have information on the identities of its counterparties.

Structural remediation is still possible

Problems identified before a liquidity event can still be addressed — structures consolidated, authorizations pursued, better-structured alternatives sourced. Once an S-1 is filed, the window for remediation narrows significantly.

We analyze the full structure and assess what others overlook.

Most secondary transactions are evaluated on headline price and company name. The ownership structure underneath — the layered entities, the fee provisions at each level, and the authorization status of the chain — goes unexamined.

Our analysis surfaces the structural risks and cost dynamics that determine whether a position will perform as expected — or create problems at the worst possible moment.

Sample Ownership Chain Analysis
You
Limited Partner — $250K committed
SPV Layer 1 — Venture Access Fund LLC
Delaware LLC · GP: disclosed
5% mgmt + 20% carry
SPV Layer 2 — Innovation Holdings LP
Cayman Islands · Operating agreement not provided
15% upfront + 10% carry
Target Company
Authorization status: UNVERIFIED
Total Fee Drag ~38% of gains
High Risk
We analyze positions in the most actively traded private companies
SpaceXAnthropicOpenAIStripeAndurilDatabricksxAICanvaKlarnaDiscord

Two engagement models

Whether you're evaluating a prospective transaction or assessing positions already in your portfolio, we provide the structural analysis required to make informed decisions.

Portfolio-Level
Position Audit
For investors holding multiple secondary positions across platforms and intermediaries, we conduct a comprehensive portfolio-level review — analyzing structural integrity, aggregate fee exposure, and concentration risk to prioritize where attention is needed.
  • Consolidated portfolio view across all positions, platforms, and intermediaries
  • Position-by-position risk assessment based on documentation quality and structural soundness
  • Aggregate fee analysis across disclosed layers with identification of undisclosed cost exposure
  • Counterparty concentration and documentation gap assessment
  • Prioritized action plan ranked by urgency

From initial conversation to actionable intelligence

01
Initial Consultation
We discuss your position or prospective transaction and scope the engagement. No cost, no commitment — just an honest assessment of whether a full review would be valuable for your situation.
02
Structural Analysis
We conduct a comprehensive review of the position's structure, applying our proprietary assessment framework to evaluate risk across multiple dimensions.
03
Advisory Report
You receive a detailed deliverable with risk ratings, fee analysis, and a prioritized set of diligence items — designed to support an informed investment decision.
04
Execution Support
Where structural issues are identified, we can help source better-structured access to the same company through vetted counterparties in our network.

Findings from recent structural reviews

These are representative issues identified through our analysis — risks that don't surface on listing pages but live in operating agreements, side letters, and the structural gaps between layers.

Fee Structure
Accelerated management fee obscuring true cost basis
A side letter replaced the standard 2% annual management fee with a 15% one-time upfront charge — non-refundable, deducted from committed capital before deployment. On a $1M position, this represents $150K in immediate cost, requiring approximately 17.6% gross return to reach breakeven.
Authorization
Issuer actively voiding unauthorized SPV structures
An investor held a position through an intermediary whose SPV structure was never authorized by the issuing company. Public statements from the company's leadership indicated active enforcement against unauthorized transfers — placing the entire position at risk of being declared void.
Hidden Layer
Reference to undisclosed third entity in operating agreement
What was presented as a two-layer structure contained a reference to a third intermediary with its own carry provision buried in the operating agreement. The disclosed fee structure didn't account for this layer — and the full terms weren't available without requesting additional documents.
Better Path
Same company, cleaner structure through better-vetted source
After flagging multiple documentation gaps and fee concerns in a proposed deal, we identified access to the same company through a single-layer, regulated vehicle with transparent terms — materially reducing structural risk and improving the investor's position.

Diligence before deployment.

Every engagement begins with a preliminary conversation to understand the position, the structure, and the level of review required. No cost for the initial consultation.

Typical response within 24 hours · All information held in strict confidence